scala – 以模块化方式创建Specs2匹配器
我有函数A =>双.我想检查两个这样的函数是否为给定的值集给出相同的结果(使用现有的beCloseTo匹配器的公差).
我希望能写: type TF = A => Double (f: TF) must computeSameResultsAs(g: TF,tolerance: Double,tests: Set[A]) 我想以模块化的方式构建这个匹配器,而不是简单地从头开始编写Matcher [TF]. 如果我能写的话可能会更好: (f: TF) must computeSameResultsAs(g: TF) .withTolerance(tolerance) .onValues(tests: Set[A]) 另外,我想在匹配器失败时获得合理的描述. 编辑 睡了之后我想出了以下内容. def computeSameResultsAs[A](ref: A => Double,args: Set[A]): Matcher[A => Double] = args.map(beCloSEOnArg(ref,tolerance,_)).reduce(_ and _) def beCloSEOnArg[A](ref: A => Double,arg: A): Matcher[A => Double] = closeTo(ref(arg),tolerance) ^^ ((_: A => Double).apply(arg)) 这比Eric的解决方案短得多,但没有提供良好的失败信息.我希望能够在第二种方法中重命名映射值.像下面的东西(不编译). def beCloSEOnArg[A](ref: A => Double,tolerance) ^^ ((_: A => Double).apply(arg) aka "result on argument " + arg) 解决方法
如果你想用第二个版本编写东西,你需要创建一个新的Matcher类来封装beCloseTo匹配器的功能:
def computeSameResultsAs[A](g: A => Double,tolerance: Double = 0.0,values: Seq[A] = Seq()) = TFMatcher(g,values) case class TFMatcher[A](g: A => Double,values: Seq[A] = Seq()) extends Matcher[A => Double] { def apply[S <: A => Double](f: Expectable[S]) = { // see definition below } def withTolerance(t: Double) = TFMatcher(g,t,values) def onValues(tests: A*) = TFMatcher(g,tests) } 这个类允许使用你以后的语法: val f = (i: Int) => i.toDouble val g = (i: Int) => i.toDouble + 0.1 "f must be close to another similar function with a tolerance" in { f must computeSameResultsAs[Int](g).withTolerance(0.5).onValues(1,2,3) } 现在,让我们看看如何在apply方法中重用beCloseTo匹配器: def apply[S <: A => Double](f: Expectable[S]) = { val res = ((v: A) => beCloseTo(g(v) +/- tolerance).apply(theValue(f.value(v)))).forall(values) val message = "f is "+(if (res.isSuccess) "" else "not ")+ "close to g with a tolerance of "+tolerance+" "+ "on values "+values.mkString(",")+": "+res.message result(res.isSuccess,message,f) } 在上面的代码中,我们应用一个返回MatcherResult to a sequence of values的函数: ((v: A) => beCloseTo(g(v) +/- tolerance).apply(theValue(f.value(v)))).forall(values) 注意: > f是可预期的[A => Double]所以我们需要把它的实际值用来使用它 最后,我们在有forall匹配的结果时,我们可以使用以下方法自定义结果消息: >构建MatchResult的继承结果方法(任何匹配器的apply方法应返回的内容) 我不确定我们可以根据您的要求获得更多模块化.在我看来,我们在这里做的最好的事情就是重复使用带有forall的beCloseTo. UPDATE 较短的答案可能是这样的: val f = (i: Int) => i.toDouble val g = (i: Int) => i.toDouble + 1.0 "f must be close to another similar function with a tolerance" in { f must computeSameResultsAs[Int](g,tolerance = 0.5,values = Seq(1,3)) } def computeSameResultsAs[A](ref: A => Double,values: Seq[A]): Matcher[A => Double] = (f: A => Double) => { verifyFunction((a: A) => (beCloseTo(ref(a) +/- tolerance)).apply(theValue(f(a)))).forall(values) } 上面的代码创建了一条失败消息,如: In the sequence '1,3',the 1st element is failing: 1.0 is not close to 2.0 +/- 0.5 这几乎应该是开箱即用的.缺失的部分是来自A =>的隐式转换. MatchResult [_]到Matcher [A](我将添加到下一个版本): implicit def functionResultToMatcher[T](f: T => MatchResult[_]): Matcher[T] = (t: T) => { val result = f(t) (result.isSuccess,result.message) } 如果要获得所有失败,可以使用 1.0 is not close to 2.0 +/- 0.5; 2.0 is not close to 3.0 +/- 0.5; 3.0 is not close to 4.0 +/- 0.5 更新2 这每天都变得更好.使用最新的specs2快照,您可以编写: def computeSameResultsAs[A](ref: A => Double,values: Seq[A]): Matcher[A => Double] = (f: A => Double) => { ((a: A) => beCloseTo(ref(a) +/- tolerance) ^^ f).forall(values) } 更新3 现在使用最新的specs2快照,你可以写: def computeSameResultsAs[A](ref: A => Double,values: Seq[A]): Matcher[A => Double] = (f: A => Double) => { ((a: A) => beCloseTo(ref(a) +/- tolerance) ^^ ((a1: A) => f(a) aka "the value")).forall(values) } 失败消息将是: In the sequence '1,the 1st element is failing: the value '1.0' is not close to 2.0 +/- 0.5 (编辑:李大同) 【声明】本站内容均来自网络,其相关言论仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本站立场。若无意侵犯到您的权利,请及时与联系站长删除相关内容! |