Postgresql COALESCE性能问题
发布时间:2020-12-13 16:01:05 所属栏目:百科 来源:网络整理
导读:我在 Postgresql中有这个表: CREATE TABLE my_table( id bigint NOT NULL,value bigint,CONSTRAINT my_table_pkey PRIMARY KEY (id)); my_table中有大约50000行. 问题是,为什么查询: SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE id = COALESCE(null,id) and value = ?
我在
Postgresql中有这个表:
CREATE TABLE my_table ( id bigint NOT NULL,value bigint,CONSTRAINT my_table_pkey PRIMARY KEY (id) ); my_table中有大约50000行. 问题是,为什么查询: SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE id = COALESCE(null,id) and value = ? 比这个慢: SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE value = ? 除了在app-layer中优化查询字符串之外,还有其他解决方案吗? 编辑:实际上,问题是如何重写查询select * from my_table where id = coalesce(?,id)和value =?最坏情况下的表现不低于select * from my_table,其中value =?在Postgresql 9.0中 解决方法
尝试重写表单的查询
SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE value = ? AND (? IS NULL OR id = ?) 从我自己的快速测试 INSERT INTO my_table select generate_series(1,50000),1; UPDATE my_table SET value = id%17; CREATE INDEX val_idx ON my_table(value); VACUUM ANALYZE my_table; set idval 17 set pval 0 explain analyze SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE value = :pval AND (:idval IS NULL OR id = :idval); Index Scan using my_table_pkey on my_table (cost=0.00..8.29 rows=1 width=16) (actual time=0.034..0.035 rows=1 loops=1) Index Cond: (id = 17) Filter: (value = 0) Total runtime: 0.064 ms set idval null explain analyze SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE value = :pval AND (:idval IS NULL OR id = :idval); Bitmap Heap Scan on my_table (cost=58.59..635.62 rows=2882 width=16) (actual time=0.373..1.594 rows=2941 loops=1) Recheck Cond: (value = 0) -> Bitmap Index Scan on validx (cost=0.00..57.87 rows=2882 width=0) (actual time=0.324..0.324 rows=2941 loops=1) Index Cond: (value = 0) Total runtime: 1.811 ms (编辑:李大同) 【声明】本站内容均来自网络,其相关言论仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本站立场。若无意侵犯到您的权利,请及时与联系站长删除相关内容! |