加入收藏 | 设为首页 | 会员中心 | 我要投稿 李大同 (https://www.lidatong.com.cn/)- 科技、建站、经验、云计算、5G、大数据,站长网!
当前位置: 首页 > 综合聚焦 > 资源网站 > 资源 > 正文

domain-name-system – 我是否需要保留SPF TXT记录以实现向后兼

发布时间:2020-12-14 23:37:51 所属栏目:资源 来源:网络整理
导读:有一个专用的DNS SPF记录,可用于SPF记录.但是,DNS TXT记录也可用于向后兼容. 如果我可以定义SPF记录 – 我应该删除已弃用的TXT记录还是留下它? 解决方法 实际上在 RFC 7208,section 3.1.之后你应该只使用TXT类型记录: SPF records MUST be published as a
有一个专用的DNS SPF记录,可用于SPF记录.但是,DNS TXT记录也可用于向后兼容.

如果我可以定义SPF记录 – 我应该删除已弃用的TXT记录还是留下它?

解决方法

实际上在 RFC 7208,section 3.1.之后你应该只使用TXT类型记录:

SPF records MUST be published as a DNS TXT (type 16) Resource Record
(RR) [RFC1035] only. The character content of the record is encoded
as [US-ASCII]. Use of alternative DNS RR types was supported in
SPF’s experimental phase but has been discontinued.

SPFBR工作组已于2014年4月弃用SPF RR类型.对此的推理也可以在RFC 7208,section 3.1.中找到,其中淘汰了旧的RFC 4408:

In 2003,when SPF was first being developed,the requirements for assignment of a new DNS RR type were considerably more stringent than they are now. Additionally,support for easy deployment of new DNS RR types was not widely deployed in DNS servers and provisioning systems. As a result,developers of SPF found it easier and more practical to use the TXT RR type for SPF records.

(编辑:李大同)

【声明】本站内容均来自网络,其相关言论仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本站立场。若无意侵犯到您的权利,请及时与联系站长删除相关内容!

    推荐文章
      热点阅读