我在AngularJS中的双向无限滚动有什么问题?
我为使用AngularJS构建的移动Web应用程序构建了一个无限滚动,具有以下附加功能:
>我把它建成双向的 这是jsfiddle链接. 现在,我有几个问题,我还需要一个小代码审查: >我不熟悉promises,但是然后()似乎在$digest之前执行.因此,我需要使用$timeout延迟我的代码.对我而言,这表明出现了问题.我想在第85行和第98行删除$timeout.第85行的$timeout有点“hacky”,我需要确保它在ms之后被执行(否则,它将无效并且我不会不知道为什么. 我知道这些可能是单独的问题,但它们与我的代码密切相关. 对于那些不想点击jsfiddle链接的人,这里是代码: HTML: <div id="fixed" scroll-watch="4" scroll-up="loadTop()" scroll-down="loadBottom()"> <ul> <li data-id="{{i.id}}" ng-repeat="i in items" ng-class="calculateType(i.id)">{{i.id}}</li> </ul> </div> JS: function Main($scope,$timeout,$q) { var cleanup = 5; $scope.items = []; //This is called from the scrollWatch directive. IMO,this shouldn't be a good idea $scope.init = function(value) { var deferred = $q.defer(); //This $timeout is used to simulate an Ajax call so I will keep it there $timeout(function() { $scope.items = [{id: +value}]; $scope.loadTop(); $scope.loadBottom(); deferred.resolve(); },200); return deferred.promise; }; //This is only used to simulate different content's heights $scope.calculateType = function(type) { return 'type-' + Math.abs(type) % 4; }; $scope.loadBottom = function() { var deferred = $q.defer(),counter; if ($scope.items.length > 1) { $scope.items.splice(0,cleanup); } //This $timeout is used to simulate an Ajax call so I will keep it there $timeout(function() { counter = (($scope.items[$scope.items.length - 1]) || {id: 0}).id; for (var i = 1; i < 6; i++) { $scope.items.push({id: counter + i}); } deferred.resolve(); },200); return deferred.promise; }; $scope.loadTop = function() { var deferred = $q.defer(),counter; //Why can't I use this here? //$scope.items.splice($scope.items.length-cleanup,$scope.items.length); //This $timeout is used to simulate an Ajax call so I will keep it there $timeout(function() { counter = (($scope.items[0]) || {id: 0}).id; for (var i = 1; i < 6; i++) { $scope.items.unshift({id: counter - i}); } deferred.resolve(); },200); return deferred.promise; }; //Why is this method needs to be delayed inside the directive? I would like to call it in loadTop() $scope.removeBottom = function() { $scope.items.splice($scope.items.length-cleanup,$scope.items.length); }; } angular.module('scroll',[]).directive('scrollWatch',['$timeout',function($timeout) { var lastScrollTop = 0; return function($scope,elm,attr) { var raw = elm[0]; $scope.init(attr.scrollWatch).then(function() { //Why do I need this? It looks like the resolve is called before the $digest cycle $timeout(function() { raw.scrollTop = $('li[data-id="' + attr.scrollWatch + '"]').position().top; },300); //This value needs to be great enough so it is executed after the $scope.loadTop()'s resolve,for now,I know that I can set it to 300 but in real life app? }); elm.bind('scroll',function() { if (raw.scrollTop > lastScrollTop && raw.scrollTop + raw.offsetHeight >= raw.scrollHeight) { $scope.$apply(attr.scrollDown); } else if (raw.scrollTop < lastScrollTop && raw.scrollTop === 0) { var scrollHeight = raw.scrollHeight; $scope.$apply(attr.scrollUp).then(function() { //Why do I need this? It looks like the resolve is called before the $digest cycle $timeout(function() { raw.scrollTop = raw.scrollHeight - scrollHeight; //I would like to move this in the $scope.loadTop() $scope.removeBottom(); }); }); } lastScrollTop = raw.scrollTop; }); }; }]); 谢谢 解决方法
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o84ryzNp36Q
是关于Promises的精彩视频,如何编写它们以及它们如何工作. https://github.com/stackfull/angular-virtual-scroll 我会把它作为评论,但你需要50信誉或声誉或他们称之为的任何东西. (编辑:李大同) 【声明】本站内容均来自网络,其相关言论仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本站立场。若无意侵犯到您的权利,请及时与联系站长删除相关内容! |