最近一来因工作上的事情比较闹心,没心事再研究 SQLServer2005 的体系结构;一来关于体系结构确实过于复杂,远远不如应用来的直接明了,所以暂时搁笔。
出于工作上的需要,对应用开发需要更多的了解,所以把心事暂时放到这方面。
?
先从最简单的 SQL 入手来分析一下 SQL 的执行步骤,为什么了解执行步骤,其实与 JOIN 后的 ON 条件和 WHERE 条件容易混淆有关系。
是先执行 ON 还是先执行 WHERE ,很大程度上会决定 SQL 的结果集正确与否。
|
CREATE TABLE Customers
(
? CustomerID? CHAR(5)???? NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
? City??????? VARCHAR(10) NOT NULL
);
CREATE TABLE Orders
(
? OrderID???? INT???? NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
? CustomerID? CHAR(5) NULL REFERENCES Customers(CustomerID)
);
?
INSERT INTO Customers VALUES('FISSA','Madrid');
INSERT INTO Customers VALUES('FRNDO','Madrid');
INSERT INTO Customers VALUES('KRLOS','Madrid');
INSERT INTO Customers VALUES('MRPHS','Zion');
INSERT INTO Orders VALUES(1,'FRNDO');
INSERT INTO Orders VALUES(2,'FRNDO');
INSERT INTO Orders VALUES(3,'KRLOS');
INSERT INTO Orders VALUES(4,'KRLOS');
INSERT INTO Orders VALUES(5,'KRLOS');
INSERT INTO Orders VALUES(6,'MRPHS');
INSERT INTO Orders VALUES(7,NULL);
?
试看看以上两个语句有什么不同,你就会发现很有趣的现象。
SELECT C.CustomerID,COUNT(O.OrderID) AS NumOrders
? FROM Customers C
? LEFT OUTER JOIN Orders O
??? ON C.CustomerID=O.CustomerID
? WHERE C.City='Madrid'
? GROUP BY C.CustomerID
? HAVING COUNT(O.OrderID)<3
? ORDER BY NumOrders;
?
SELECT C.CustomerID,COUNT(O.OrderID) AS NumOrders
? FROM Customers C
? LEFT OUTER JOIN Orders O
??? ON C.CustomerID=O.CustomerID
??? AND C.City='Madrid'
? GROUP BY C.CustomerID
? HAVING COUNT(O.OrderID)<3
? ORDER BY NumOrders;
?
--Step1 ,首先对 FROM 后面的表进行笛卡尔乘积,生成虚表 STEP1
WITH STEP1
AS
(
SELECT C.CustomerID C_CustomerID,C.City C_City,O.OrderID O_OrderID,O.CustomerID O_CustomerID
? FROM Customers C,Orders O
)
SELECT * FROM STEP1
?
--Step2 ,再次应用 ON 语句中的条件,如果没有外关联的话,这里的 ON 和 WHERE 实际上是没有什么差别的,生成虚表 STEP2
WITH STEP2
AS
(
SELECT C.CustomerID C_CustomerID,O.CustomerID O_CustomerID
? FROM Customers C
? JOIN Orders O
??? ON C.CustomerID=O.CustomerID
)
SELECT * FROM STEP2
?
--Step3 ,如果指定了 OUTER JOIN , SQL 会自动把 STEP2 表中未匹配的行作为外部行添加到 STEP3 中,此处找到了 CustomerID=FISSA,City=Madrid ,这个没有订单但又有相关名字的用户
WITH STEP3
AS
(
SELECT C.CustomerID C_CustomerID,O.CustomerID O_CustomerID
? FROM Customers C
? LEFT OUTER JOIN Orders O
??? ON C.CustomerID=O.CustomerID
)
SELECT * FROM STEP3
?
--Step4 ,应用 WHERE 条件,过滤不符合条件的记录
AS
(
SELECT C.CustomerID C_CustomerID,O.CustomerID O_CustomerID
? FROM Customers C
? LEFT OUTER JOIN Orders O
??? ON C.CustomerID=O.CustomerID
? WHERE C.City='Madrid'
)
SELECT * FROM STEP4
?
--Step5 ,对以上的结果集进行分组
WITH STEP5
AS
(
SELECT C.CustomerID,COUNT(O.OrderID) AS NumOrders
? FROM Customers C
? LEFT OUTER JOIN Orders O
??? ON C.CustomerID=O.CustomerID
? WHERE C.City='Madrid'
? GROUP BY C.CustomerID
)
SELECT * FROM STEP5
?
--Step6 ,处理 CUBE 、 ROLLUP 之类的语句,此处无此需求
略
SELECT * FROM STEP6
?
--Step7 处理 Having 筛选器,与 WHERE 条件有些类似
WITH STEP7
AS
(
SELECT C.CustomerID,COUNT(O.OrderID) AS NumOrders
? FROM Customers C
? LEFT OUTER JOIN Orders O
??? ON C.CustomerID=O.CustomerID
? WHERE C.City='Madrid'
? GROUP BY C.CustomerID
? HAVING COUNT(O.OrderID)<3
)
SELECT * FROM STEP7
?
--Step8 ,处理 SELECT 列表,即别名转换把 COUNT(O.OrderID) 转换成 NumOrders
略
SELECT * FROM STEP8
?
--Step9 ,应用 DISTINCT 语句,此处无此需求
略
SELECT * FROM STEP9
?
--Step10 ,应用 ORDER BY 语句进行排序
SELECT C.CustomerID,COUNT(O.OrderID) AS NumOrders
? FROM Customers C
? LEFT OUTER JOIN Orders O
??? ON C.CustomerID=O.CustomerID
? WHERE C.City='Madrid'
? GROUP BY C.CustomerID
? HAVING COUNT(O.OrderID)<3
? ORDER BY NumOrders
?
--Step11 ,执行 TOP 选项,此处无此需求
略
SELECT * FROM STEP11
(编辑:李大同)
【声明】本站内容均来自网络,其相关言论仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本站立场。若无意侵犯到您的权利,请及时与联系站长删除相关内容!