sqlserver上一页,下一页以及高效分页查询语句
发布时间:2020-12-12 13:59:05 所属栏目:MsSql教程 来源:网络整理
导读:方法一: ? string preSql = "select top 1 * from news where news_id " + id + " order by news_id DESC" ? string nextSql = "select top 1 * from news where news_id " + id + " order by news_id ASC" ? 方法二: ? string preSql = "select * from [n
方法一:
?
string preSql = "select top 1 * from news where news_id < " + id + " order by news_id DESC"
?
string nextSql = "select top 1 * from news where news_id > " + id + " order by news_id ASC"
?
方法二:
?
string preSql = "select * from [news] where news_id = (select MAX(news_id) from [news] where news_id<"+ id + ")";
string nextSql = "select * from [news] where news_id = (select MIN(news_id) from [news] where news_id>"+ id + ")";
?
?
?
?
SQLSERVER高效分页查询
?
?Sqlserver
数据库分页查询一直是Sqlserver的短板,闲来无事,想出几种方法,假设有表ARTICLE,字段ID、YEAR...(其他省略),数据53210条(客户真实数据,量不大),分页查询每页30条,查询第1500页(即第45001-45030条数据),字段ID聚集索引,YEAR无索引,Sqlserver版本:2008R2
? ? ?最简单、普通的方法: ?www.2cto.com ?
?
Sql代码 ?
SELECT TOP 30 * FROM ARTICLE WHERE ID NOT IN(SELECT TOP 45000 ID FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC,ID DESC) ORDER BY YEAR DESC,ID DESC ?
? ? ?平均查询100次所需时间:45s
?
? ? ?第二种方案
?
Sql代码 ?
SELECT * FROM (SELECT TOP 30 * FROM (SELECT TOP 45030 * FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC,ID DESC) f ORDER BY f.YEAR ASC,f.ID DESC) s ORDER BY s.YEAR DESC,s.ID DESC ?
? ? ?平均查询100次所需时间:138S
?
? ? ?第三种方案
?
Sql代码 ?
SELECT * FROM ARTICLE w1,(SELECT TOP 30 ID FROM (SELECT TOP 50030 ID,YEAR FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC,ID DESC) w ORDER BY w.YEAR ASC,w.ID ASC) w2 WHERE w1.ID = w2.ID ORDER BY w1.YEAR DESC,w1.ID DESC ?
? ? ?平均查询100次所需时间:21S
?
? ? ?第四种方案
Sql代码 ?
SELECT * FROM QKW_wenzhang w1 WHERE wenzhang_id in (SELECT top 30 wenzhang_id FROM (SELECT top 45030 wenzhang_id,nian FROM QKW_wenzhang ORDER BY nian DESC,wenzhang_id DESC) w ORDER BY w.nian ASC,w.wenzhang_id ASC) ORDER BY w1.nian DESC,w1.wenzhang_id DESC ?
? ? ?平均查询100次所需时间:20S
?
? ? ?第五种方案 ?www.2cto.com ?
?
Sql代码 ?
SELECT w2.n,w1.* FROM ARTICLE w1,(SELECT TOP 50030 row_number() OVER (ORDER BY YEAR DESC,ID DESC) n,ID FROM ARTICLE ) w2 WHERE w1.ID = w2.ID AND w2.n > 50000 ORDER BY w2.n ASC ?
? ? ?平均查询100次所需时间:15S
?
?查询第1000-1030条记录
?
Sql代码 ?
SELECT TOP 30 * FROM ARTICLE WHERE ID NOT IN(SELECT TOP 1000 ID FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC,ID DESC ?
? ? ?平均查询100次所需时间:80s
?
? ? ?第二种方案
?
Sql代码 ?
SELECT * FROM (SELECT TOP 30 * FROM (SELECT TOP 1030 * FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC,s.ID DESC ?
? ? ?平均查询100次所需时间:30S
?
? ? ?第三种方案
?
Sql代码 ?
SELECT * FROM ARTICLE w1,(SELECT TOP 30 ID FROM (SELECT TOP 1030 ID,w1.ID DESC ?
? ? ?平均查询100次所需时间:12S
?
? ? ?第四种方案
Sql代码 ?
SELECT * FROM QKW_wenzhang w1 WHERE wenzhang_id in (SELECT top 30 wenzhang_id FROM (SELECT top 1030 wenzhang_id,w1.wenzhang_id DESC ?
? ? ?平均查询100次所需时间:13S
?
? ? ?第五种方案 ?www.2cto.com ?
?
Sql代码 ?
SELECT w2.n,(SELECT TOP 1030 row_number() OVER (ORDER BY YEAR DESC,ID FROM ARTICLE ) w2 WHERE w1.ID = w2.ID AND w2.n > 1000 ORDER BY w2.n ASC ?
? ? ?平均查询100次所需时间:14S
?
? ? ?由此可见在查询页数靠前时,效率3>4>5>2>1,页码靠后时5>4>3>1>2,再根据用户习惯,一般用户的检索只看最前面几页,因此选择3 4 5方案均可,若综合考虑方案5是最好的选择,但是要注意SQL2000不支持row_number()函数,由于时间和条件的限制没有做更深入、范围更广的测试,有兴趣的可以仔细研究下。
(编辑:李大同) 【声明】本站内容均来自网络,其相关言论仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本站立场。若无意侵犯到您的权利,请及时与联系站长删除相关内容! |