SQL Server 2008中的临时表上的sql-server – nolock
发布时间:2020-12-12 08:22:46 所属栏目:MsSql教程 来源:网络整理
导读:添加(Nolock)会从临时表中选择时减少争用,还是SQL Server足够聪明,不能首先创建对临时表的争用? PS:是的,我知道READUNCOMMITTED的危险. select * from #myTempTable VS select * from #myTempTable with (nolock) --is this faster? 解决方法 您可以使用跟
添加(Nolock)会从临时表中选择时减少争用,还是SQL Server足够聪明,不能首先创建对临时表的争用?
PS:是的,我知道READUNCOMMITTED的危险. select * from #myTempTable VS select * from #myTempTable with (nolock) --is this faster? 解决方法您可以使用跟踪标志1200(在我认为这是全局的开发机器上)来查看为自己取出的锁SET NOCOUNT ON; CREATE TABLE ##T ( X INT ) INSERT INTO ##T SELECT number FROM master..spt_values CREATE TABLE #T ( X INT ) INSERT INTO #T SELECT * FROM ##T /*Run the commands first with the trace flag off so the locking info is less full of irrelevant stuff about plan compilation */ GO PRINT '##T Read Committed' SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ##T PRINT '##T NOLOCK' SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ##T WITH (NOLOCK) PRINT '##T Finished' GO PRINT '#T Read Committed' SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #T PRINT '#T NOLOCK' SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #T WITH (NOLOCK) PRINT '#T Finished' GO DBCC TRACEON(-1,3604) DBCC TRACEON(-1,1200) GO PRINT '##T Read Committed' SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ##T PRINT '##T NOLOCK' SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ##T WITH (NOLOCK) PRINT '##T Finished' GO PRINT '#T Read Committed' SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #T PRINT '#T NOLOCK' SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #T WITH (NOLOCK) PRINT '#T Finished' GO DBCC TRACEOFF(-1,3604) DBCC TRACEOFF(-1,1200) DROP TABLE ##T DROP TABLE #T 对于一个全球的临时表,这并不奇怪,使得更多的区别. 尽管如此,本地#temp表的锁类型仍然存在较小差异.我再现下面输出的那部分输出 #T Read Committed Process 56 acquiring IS lock on OBJECT: 2:301244128:0 (class bit0 ref1) result: OK Process 56 acquiring S lock on OBJECT: 2:301244128:0 (class bit0 ref1) result: OK Process 56 releasing lock on OBJECT: 2:301244128:0 #T NOLOCK Process 56 acquiring Sch-S lock on OBJECT: 2:301244128:0 (class bit0 ref1) result: OK Process 56 acquiring S lock on HOBT: 2:9079256880114171904 [BULK_OPERATION] (class bit0 ref1) result: OK Process 56 releasing lock on OBJECT: 2:301244128:0 编辑:上面的结果是一个堆.对于具有聚簇索引的临时表,结果如下. #T Read Committed Process 55 acquiring IS lock on OBJECT: 2:1790629422:0 (class bit0 ref1) result: OK Process 55 acquiring S lock on OBJECT: 2:1790629422:0 (class bit0 ref1) result: OK Process 55 releasing lock on OBJECT: 2:1790629422:0 #T NOLOCK Process 55 acquiring Sch-S lock on OBJECT: 2:1790629422:0 (class bit0 ref1) result: OK Process 55 releasing lock on OBJECT: 2:1790629422:0 #T Finished 堆版本上的BULK_OPERATION锁的原因是explained here.但是可以看出,锁定开销是非常小的. (编辑:李大同) 【声明】本站内容均来自网络,其相关言论仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本站立场。若无意侵犯到您的权利,请及时与联系站长删除相关内容! |