delphi – 编译器提示/警告当传递对象实例直接作为const接口参数
当将对象的新实例传递给具有对象的类实现的接口的const接口参数的方法时,编译器是否提示/警告?
编辑:样本当然很简单,可以说明问题.但在现实生活中,它变得越来越复杂:如果创建和使用的代码远远不同(不同的单元,不同的类,不同的项目)会怎么样?如果由不同的人维护怎么办?如果一个非const参数变成一个const参数,而不是所有的调用代码都可以被检查(因为改变代码的人不能访问所有的调用代码)呢? 下面的代码崩溃,很难找到原因. 首先是日志: 1.Run begin 1.RunLeakCrash 2.RunLeakCrash begin NewInstance 1 AfterConstruction 0 3.LeakCrash begin _AddRef 1 4.Dump begin 4.Dump Reference=10394576 4.Dump end _Release 0 _Release Destroy BeforeDestruction 0 3.LeakCrash Reference got destroyed if it had a RefCount of 1 upon entry,so now it can be unsafe to access it _AddRef 1 4.Dump begin 4.Dump Reference=10394576 4.Dump end _Release 0 _Release Destroy BeforeDestruction 0 3.LeakCrash end with exception 1.Run end EInvalidPointer: Invalid pointer operation 然后代码过早释放实现接口的对象实例: //{$define all} program InterfaceConstParmetersAndPrematureFreeingProject; {$APPTYPE CONSOLE} uses SysUtils,Windows,MyInterfacedObjectUnit in '..srcMyInterfacedObjectUnit.pas'; procedure Dump(Reference: IInterface); begin Writeln(' 4.Dump begin'); Writeln(' 4.Dump Reference=',Integer(PChar(Reference))); Writeln(' 4.Dump end'); end; procedure LeakCrash(const Reference: IInterface); begin Writeln(' 3.LeakCrash begin'); try Dump(Reference); // now we leak because the caller does not keep a reference to us Writeln(' 3.LeakCrash Reference got destroyed if it had a RefCount of 1 upon entry,so now it can be unsafe to access it'); Dump(Reference); // we might crash here except begin Writeln(' 3.LeakCrash end with exception'); raise; end; end; Writeln(' 3.LeakCrash end'); end; procedure RunLeakCrash; begin Writeln(' 2.RunLeakCrash begin'); LeakCrash(TMyInterfacedObject.Create()); Writeln(' 2.RunLeakCrash end'); end; procedure Run(); begin try Writeln('1.Run begin'); Writeln(''); Writeln('1.RunLeakCrash'); RunLeakCrash(); finally Writeln(''); Writeln('1.Run end'); end; end; begin try Run(); except on E: Exception do Writeln(E.ClassName,': ',E.Message); end; Readln; end. EInvalidPointer将在第二次调用Dump(Reference); 有关编译器插入或省略的引用计数代码的几个注释: >没有标记const的参数(如在过程Dump(参考:IInterface));)获取隐式try / finally块来执行引用计数. 所有上述编译器行为都是非常合乎逻辑的,但是它们可以导致一个EInvalidPointer. 编译器是否提示或警告您这种使用模式? 最后我用代码跟踪所有的_AddRef / _Release / etcetera调用: unit MyInterfacedObjectUnit; interface type // Adpoted copy of TInterfacedObject for debugging TMyInterfacedObject = class(TObject,IInterface) protected FRefCount: Integer; function QueryInterface(const IID: TGUID; out Obj): HResult; stdcall; function _AddRef: Integer; stdcall; function _Release: Integer; stdcall; public procedure AfterConstruction; override; procedure BeforeDestruction; override; class function NewInstance: TObject; override; property RefCount: Integer read FRefCount; end; implementation uses Windows; procedure TMyInterfacedObject.AfterConstruction; begin InterlockedDecrement(FRefCount); Writeln(' AfterConstruction ',FRefCount); end; procedure TMyInterfacedObject.BeforeDestruction; begin Writeln(' BeforeDestruction ',FRefCount); if RefCount <> 0 then System.Error(reInvalidPtr); end; class function TMyInterfacedObject.NewInstance: TObject; begin Result := inherited NewInstance; TMyInterfacedObject(Result).FRefCount := 1; Writeln(' NewInstance ',TMyInterfacedObject(Result).FRefCount); end; function TMyInterfacedObject.QueryInterface(const IID: TGUID; out Obj): HResult; begin Writeln(' QueryInterface ',FRefCount); if GetInterface(IID,Obj) then Result := 0 else Result := E_NOINTERFACE; end; function TMyInterfacedObject._AddRef: Integer; begin Result := InterlockedIncrement(FRefCount); Writeln(' _AddRef ',FRefCount); end; function TMyInterfacedObject._Release: Integer; begin Result := InterlockedDecrement(FRefCount); Writeln(' _Release ',FRefCount); if Result = 0 then begin Writeln(' _Release Destroy'); Destroy; end; end; end. –jeroen 解决方法
这是一个bug.在RunLeakCrash中从实例到接口引用的转换应该是一个临时变量,它在RunLeakCrash的持续时间内保持活动.
(编辑:李大同) 【声明】本站内容均来自网络,其相关言论仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本站立场。若无意侵犯到您的权利,请及时与联系站长删除相关内容! |