c – 为什么std :: make_shared <>()的性能比boost :: mak
发布时间:2020-12-16 07:32:50 所属栏目:百科 来源:网络整理
导读:我一直在做一些现场性能测试 1std::shared_ptr,std::make_shared based on 'gcc 4.7.2' 'VC10 implementation' 2boost::shared_ptr,boost::make_shared based on boost 1.47 测试结果有点有趣. 1通常std版本表现更好,但特别是std :: make_shared.为什么?我
我一直在做一些现场性能测试
1>std::shared_ptr,std::make_shared based on 'gcc 4.7.2' & 'VC10 implementation' 2>boost::shared_ptr,boost::make_shared based on boost 1.47 测试结果有点有趣. 1>通常std版本表现更好,但特别是std :: make_shared.为什么?我可以增加升级版本的性能,因为C 11不适用于某些旧项目,因为他们使用旧版本的Visual Studio吗? 下面是我用于测试这些内容的代码段. #include "stdafx.h" #include <vector> #include <iostream> #include <boost/shared_ptr.hpp> #include <boostmake_shared.hpp> #include "SimpleMSTimer.hpp"//my timer wrapper for boost ptime using namespace std; using namespace boost; class Thing { public: Thing() { } void method (void) { int i = 5; } }; typedef boost::shared_ptr<Thing> ThingPtr; void processThing(Thing* thing) { thing->method(); } //loop1 and loop2 test shared_ptr in the vector container void loop1(long long num) { cout << "native raw pointer: "; vector<Thing> thingPtrs; YiUtil::MSSegmentTimer segTimer(YiUtil::MSSegmentTimer::MLSEC,std::cout); for(int i=0; i< num; i++) { Thing thing; thingPtrs.push_back(thing); } thingPtrs.clear(); } void loop2(long long num) { cout << "native boost::shared_ptr: "; vector<ThingPtr> thingPtrs; YiUtil::MSSegmentTimer segTimer(YiUtil::MSSegmentTimer::MLSEC,std::cout); for(int i=0; i< num; i++) { ThingPtr p1(new Thing); thingPtrs.push_back(p1); } } void loop3(long long num) { cout << "optimized boost::shared_ptr: "; vector<ThingPtr> thingPtrs; YiUtil::MSSegmentTimer segTimer(YiUtil::MSSegmentTimer::MLSEC,std::cout); for(int i=0; i< num; i++) { ThingPtr p1 = boost::make_shared<Thing>(); thingPtrs.push_back(p1); } } //loop3 and loop4 test shared_ptr in loop void loop4(long long num) { cout << "native raw pointer: "; YiUtil::MSSegmentTimer segTimer(YiUtil::MSSegmentTimer::MLSEC,std::cout); for(int i=0; i< num; i++) { Thing* p1 = new Thing(); processThing(p1); delete p1; } } void loop5(long long num) { cout << "native boost::shared_ptr: "; YiUtil::MSSegmentTimer segTimer(YiUtil::MSSegmentTimer::MLSEC,std::cout); for(int i=0; i< num; i++) { ThingPtr p1(new Thing); processThing(p1.get()); } } void loop6(long long num) { cout << "optimized boost::shared_ptr: "; YiUtil::MSSegmentTimer segTimer(YiUtil::MSSegmentTimer::MLSEC,std::cout); for(int i=0; i< num; i++) { ThingPtr p1 = boost::make_shared<Thing>(); processThing(p1.get()); } } int main() { long long num = 10000000; cout << "test 1" << endl; loop1(num); loop2(num); loop3(num); cout << "test 2"<< endl; loop4(num); loop5(num); loop6(num); return 0; } VC10编译器在发布模式下,gcc使用标志’-O3’编译,以进行最大化优化. //VS2010 release mode //boost test 1 native raw pointer: SegmentTimer: 15 milliseconds/n native boost::shared_ptr: SegmentTimer: 3312 milliseconds/n optimized boost::shared_ptr: SegmentTimer: 3093 milliseconds/n test 2 native raw pointer: SegmentTimer: 921 milliseconds/n native boost::shared_ptr: SegmentTimer: 2359 milliseconds/n optimized boost::shared_ptr: SegmentTimer: 2203 milliseconds/n //std test 1 native raw pointer: SegmentTimer: 15 milliseconds/n native std::shared_ptr: SegmentTimer: 3390 milliseconds/n optimized std::shared_ptr: SegmentTimer: 2203 milliseconds/n test 2 native raw pointer: SegmentTimer: 937 milliseconds/n native std::shared_ptr: SegmentTimer: 2359 milliseconds/n optimized std::shared_ptr: SegmentTimer: 1343 milliseconds/n ============================================================================== gcc 4.72 release mode //boost test 1 native raw pointer: SegmentTimer: 15 milliseconds/n native boost::shared_ptr: SegmentTimer: 4874 milliseconds/n optimized boost::shared_ptr: SegmentTimer: 3687 milliseconds/n test 2 native raw pointer: SegmentTimer: 1109 milliseconds/n native boost::shared_ptr: SegmentTimer: 2546 milliseconds/n optimized boost::shared_ptr: SegmentTimer: 1578 milliseconds/n //std test 1 native raw pointer: SegmentTimer: 15 milliseconds/n native std::shared_ptr: SegmentTimer: 3374 milliseconds/n optimized std::shared_ptr: SegmentTimer: 2296 milliseconds/n test 2 native raw pointer: SegmentTimer: 1124 milliseconds/n native std::shared_ptr: SegmentTimer: 2531 milliseconds/n optimized std::shared_ptr: SegmentTimer: 1468 milliseconds/n 解决方法
它们表现得更好,因为Boost版本没有更新为使用rvalue引用,它启用了移动语义.而C 11版本确实使用移动语义.这意味着Boost版本必须更频繁地复制.如果你在一个pre-C 11编译器上进行测试,你的目标库(使用std :: tr1 :: shared_ptr)它们的表现应该更相似.
(编辑:李大同) 【声明】本站内容均来自网络,其相关言论仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本站立场。若无意侵犯到您的权利,请及时与联系站长删除相关内容! |