c – valgrind给出了未初始化的错误大小

发布时间：2020-12-16 07:24:33 所属栏目：百科来源：网络整理

导读：我在博客中看到的sample2.c代码用valgrind来说明未初始化的值.这是代码： sample2.c： 1 #include stdio.h 2 3 int main() 4 { 5 int a[5]; 6 int i,s; 7 a[0]=a[1]=a[3]=a[4]=0; 8 9 printf("%dn",a[2]);10 for(i=0;i5;i++)11 s += a[i];12 13 if(s == 377

我在博客中看到的sample2.c代码用valgrind来说明未初始化的值.这是代码：
sample2.c：

1  #include <stdio.h>
 2  
 3  int main()
 4  {
 5      int a[5];
 6      int i,s;
 7      a[0]=a[1]=a[3]=a[4]=0;
 8      
 9      printf("%dn",a[2]);
10      for(i=0;i<5;i++)
11      s += a[i];
12      
13      if(s == 377)
14      printf("sum is %dn",s);
15      return 0;
16  }

使用gcc -g -o sample2 sample2.c

valgrind –leak-check = full –track-originins = yes ./sample2

我在下面获得了valgrind检查信息.

我不明白为什么在我的机器中由于sizeof(int)== 4而使用大小为8的未初始化值？我在x64机器上运行程序,所以这是指针吗？

==31419== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
==31419==    at 0x4E7F1CB: _itoa_word (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==31419==    by 0x4E83450: vfprintf (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==31419==    by 0x4E8A338: printf (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==31419==    by 0x400561: main (sample2.c:9)
==31419==  Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==31419==    at 0x40052D: main (sample2.c:4)

完整检查信息如下：

==31419== Memcheck,a memory error detector
    ==31419== Copyright (C) 2002-2017,and GNU GPL'd,by Julian Seward et al.
    ==31419== Using Valgrind-3.14.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
    ==31419== Command: ./sample2
    ==31419== 
    ==31419== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
    ==31419==    at 0x4E81AFE: vfprintf (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
    ==31419==    by 0x4E8A338: printf (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
    ==31419==    by 0x400561: main (sample2.c:9)
    ==31419==  Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
    ==31419==    at 0x40052D: main (sample2.c:4)
    ==31419== 
    ==31419== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
    ==31419==    at 0x4E7F1CB: _itoa_word (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
    ==31419==    by 0x4E83450: vfprintf (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
    ==31419==    by 0x4E8A338: printf (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
    ==31419==    by 0x400561: main (sample2.c:9)
    ==31419==  Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
    ==31419==    at 0x40052D: main (sample2.c:4)
    ==31419== 
    ==31419== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
    ==31419==    at 0x4E7F1D5: _itoa_word (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
    ==31419==    by 0x4E83450: vfprintf (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
    ==31419==    by 0x4E8A338: printf (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
    ==31419==    by 0x400561: main (sample2.c:9)
    ==31419==  Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
    ==31419==    at 0x40052D: main (sample2.c:4)
    ==31419== 
    ==31419== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
    ==31419==    at 0x4E8349F: vfprintf (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
    ==31419==    by 0x4E8A338: printf (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
    ==31419==    by 0x400561: main (sample2.c:9)
    ==31419==  Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
    ==31419==    at 0x40052D: main (sample2.c:4)
    ==31419== 
    ==31419== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
    ==31419==    at 0x4E81BCB: vfprintf (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
    ==31419==    by 0x4E8A338: printf (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
    ==31419==    by 0x400561: main (sample2.c:9)
    ==31419==  Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
    ==31419==    at 0x40052D: main (sample2.c:4)
    ==31419== 
    ==31419== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
    ==31419==    at 0x4E81C4E: vfprintf (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
    ==31419==    by 0x4E8A338: printf (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
    ==31419==    by 0x400561: main (sample2.c:9)
    ==31419==  Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
    ==31419==    at 0x40052D: main (sample2.c:4)
    ==31419== 
    4195392
    ==31419== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
    ==31419==    at 0x400588: main (sample2.c:13)
    ==31419==  Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
    ==31419==    at 0x40052D: main (sample2.c:4)
    ==31419== 
    ==31419== 
    ==31419== HEAP SUMMARY:
    ==31419==     in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
    ==31419==   total heap usage: 0 allocs,0 frees,0 bytes allocated
    ==31419== 
    ==31419== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
    ==31419== 
    ==31419== For counts of detected and suppressed errors,rerun with: -v

解决方法

你有一个64位处理器.即使值本身是32位,它也会在64位寄存器中传递给printf;这来自x86-64的System-V调用约定.

然而,它似乎没有触发错误,直到后来,valgrind似乎只知道该值被符号扩展为64位并且最初来自您的main函数(甚至行号在那里是错误的.

如果使用-m32编译它并以某种方式设法在valgrind下运行它(我需要在Ubuntu上安装其他32位软件包),你可以在这里看到4：

==4854== Use of uninitialised value of size 4
==4854==    at 0x48A3CAB: _itoa_word (_itoa.c:179)
==4854==    by 0x48A85C5: vfprintf (vfprintf.c:1642)
==4854==    by 0x48AF2F5: printf (printf.c:33)
==4854==    by 0x1085D0: main (sample2.c:9)
==4854== 
==4854== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==4854==    at 0x48A3CB3: _itoa_word (_itoa.c:179)
==4854==    by 0x48A85C5: vfprintf (vfprintf.c:1642)
==4854==    by 0x48AF2F5: printf (printf.c:33)
==4854==    by 0x1085D0: main (sample2.c:9)
==4854==

这里需要注意的一点是,int [2]中的值是不确定的,但是没有int类型的陷阱值,并且它的地址被取而代之,因此将它传递给函数时没有未定义的行为 – 但是在库函数中使用的确如此.

（编辑：李大同）

【声明】本站内容均来自网络，其相关言论仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本站立场。若无意侵犯到您的权利，请及时与联系站长删除相关内容!