swift – 检查Hashable一致性
我有一个基本协议(模型),一些结构符合.它们也符合Hashable
protocol Model {} struct Contact: Model,Hashable { var hashValue: Int { return ... } static func ==(lhs: Contact,rhs: Contact) -> Bool { return ... } } struct Address: Model,Hashable { var hashValue: Int { return ... } static func ==(lhs: Address,rhs: Address) -> Bool { return ... } } 我有一个函数,它接受一个符合Model([Model])的对象数组. func complete(with models: [Model]) { doSomethingWithHashable(models) //can't do this } func doSomethingWithHashable <T:Hashable>(_ objects: [T]) { // } 我试图避免这种情况 protocol Model: Hashable {} func complete<T:Model>(with models: [T]) { runComparison(models) } 因为当我这样做时,我得到“模型不能用作通用约束……” protocol SomethingElse { var data: [Model] { get } }
你的代码的问题在于你在谈论Model,它对Hashable一致性没有任何承诺.正如您所指出的那样,告诉编译器关于此问题(即从Hashable派生模型)的问题是,您失去了根据符合模型的异构类型进行交谈的能力.
如果您首先不关心模型一致性,则可以使用标准库的 但是,假设您关心模型一致性,则必须为符合Model和Hashable的实例构建自己的type-erased wrapper.在my answer here中,我演示了如何为Equatable标准类型构建类型橡皮擦.可以很容易地为Hashable扩展逻辑 – 我们只需要存储一个额外的函数来返回实例的hashValue. 例如: struct AnyHashableModel : Model,Hashable { static func ==(lhs: AnyHashableModel,rhs: AnyHashableModel) -> Bool { // forward to both lhs's and rhs's _isEqual in order to determine equality. // the reason that both must be called is to preserve symmetry for when a // superclass is being compared with a subclass. // if you know you're always working with value types,you can omit one of them. return lhs._isEqual(rhs) || rhs._isEqual(lhs) } private let base: Model private let _isEqual: (_ to: AnyHashableModel) -> Bool private let _hashValue: () -> Int init<T : Model>(_ base: T) where T : Hashable { self.base = base _isEqual = { // attempt to cast the passed instance to the concrete type that // AnyHashableModel was initialised with,returning the result of that // type's == implementation,or false otherwise. if let other = $0.base as? T { return base == other } else { return false } } // simply assign a closure that captures base and returns its hashValue _hashValue = { base.hashValue } } var hashValue: Int { return _hashValue() } } 然后你会像这样使用它: func complete(with models: [AnyHashableModel]) { doSomethingWithHashable(models) } func doSomethingWithHashable<T : Hashable>(_ objects: [T]) { // } let models = [AnyHashableModel(Contact()),AnyHashableModel(Address())] complete(with: models) 在这里,我假设您还希望将其用作Model的要求的包装(假设有一些).或者,您可以公开base属性并从AnyHashableModel本身中删除Model一致性,使调用者访问基础Model符合实例的基础: struct AnyHashableModel : Hashable { // ... let base: Model // ... } 但是,您会注意到上述类型擦除的包装器仅适用于Hashable和Model的类型.如果我们想谈论符合实例Hashable的其他协议怎么办? 正如我演示in this Q&A,更通用的解决方案是接受Hashable并且符合其他协议的类型 – 其类型由通用占位符表示. 因为Swift目前还没有办法表达一个通用占位符,它必须符合另一个通用占位符给出的协议;必须由调用者使用转换闭包来定义此关系,以执行必要的向上转换.但是,由于Swift 3.1接受扩展中的具体相同类型要求,我们可以定义一个方便初始化器来删除Model的样板(这可以在其他协议类型中重复). 例如: /// Type-erased wrapper for a type that conforms to Hashable,/// but inherits from/conforms to a type T that doesn't necessarily require /// Hashable conformance. In almost all cases,T should be a protocol type. struct AnySpecificHashable<T> : Hashable { static func ==(lhs: AnySpecificHashable,rhs: AnySpecificHashable) -> Bool { return lhs._isEqual(rhs) || rhs._isEqual(lhs) } let base: T private let _isEqual: (_ to: AnySpecificHashable) -> Bool private let _hashValue: () -> Int init<U : Hashable>(_ base: U,upcast: (U) -> T) { self.base = upcast(base) _isEqual = { if let other = $0.base as? U { return base == other } else { return false } } _hashValue = { base.hashValue } } var hashValue: Int { return _hashValue() } } // extension for convenience initialiser for when T is Model. extension AnySpecificHashable where T == Model { init<U : Model>(_ base: U) where U : Hashable { self.init(base,upcast: { $0 }) } } 您现在想要将您的实例包装在AnySpecificHashable< Model>中: func complete(with models: [AnySpecificHashable<Model>]) { doSomethingWithHashable(models) } func doSomethingWithHashable<T : Hashable>(_ objects: [T]) { // } let models: [AnySpecificHashable<Model>] = [ AnySpecificHashable(Contact()),AnySpecificHashable(Address()) ] complete(with: models) (编辑:李大同) 【声明】本站内容均来自网络,其相关言论仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本站立场。若无意侵犯到您的权利,请及时与联系站长删除相关内容! |